
No. 46, May 2005
Greening of City Hall
Government offices
struggle to keep up with recycling goals by Marjorie Beggs
Juan-Tomas Rehbock, a senior IT
business analyst for the S.F. Public Utilities Commission,
is a recycling advocate’s dream: When he eats
an orange at work, he takes the peels home so he can
put them in a green compost cart. Few paper-pushing
city departments compost, which is why Rehbock totes
his peels home.
His small effort won’t do
much to reduce the 80,000 tons of waste that city government
generates annually or the $3.5 million it pays to have
garbage dumped in the Altamont landfill.
But Rehbock is a great role model
for the 600 PUC managers, engineers, customer service
reps and others who work at 1155 Market. He’s
their recycling coordinator, and his job is to get
on their case about recycling and reusing everything
possible.
A resolution the supes passed last August urges every
city department to recycle paper, cans, bottles, batteries
and toner cartridges, and departments with food service
to compost, all in an effort to reach 75% diversion by
2010 and 100% by 2020.
Diversion is a measure of how much
waste is being recycled, reused or composted, rather
than going to landfill. A rate of 100% doesn’t
mean that no garbage is being generated, but that everything
possible is being captured from the waste stream.
The Department of the Environment,
which monitors the city’s progress toward ever-greater
diversion, calculates that San Francisco as a whole
diverted 63% of its waste in 2003, the highest for
any comparable U.S. city.
But DOE estimated city government’s rate at 54%;
the supes’ resolution followed, which also ordered
every department to name a recycling coordinator and
all 27,000 city employees to get with the program.
Julia Chang, Environment’s
city government recycling coordinator, says that waste
reduction and recycling have saved the city more than
$345,000 in the last few years.
“If all departments fully participated, we could
achieve hundreds of thousands more in savings,” Chang
added.
This month, Chang is collecting
the departments’ 2004
annual surveys, documenting everything they recycle,
compost and reuse. Depending on the size of the department
and its activities, the eight-page waste audit can take
an hour – or days – to complete.
The survey is relatively new. In 1992, the city enacted
its Resource Conservation Ordinance in response to the
state Integrated Waste Management Act, which required
all cities and counties to halve their waste by 2000.
An amendment to the ordinance in 2000 mandated all departments
to document waste reduction and report annually.
Until then, there was no way to know how much was being
recycled. And today, despite efforts by committed, energetic
DOE staff, the numbers are still incomplete.
Someone who keeps at it
The S.F. PUC leases offices around the city, but its
biggest operation is at 1155 Market, where the department
occupies 140,000 square feet on 11 floors.
“I’m environmentally conscious, so I was
selected for the coordinator’s position when we
moved in here a year and a half ago,” Rehbock said. “Little
by little, it’s sinking in to everyone that they
have to recycle all the time, but it does need someone
who keeps at it.”
Rehbock has no outright refuseniks
on staff, he said. However, he regularly finds cardboard
in the garbage bins and sometimes even paper. In recycling
parlance, that’s called contamination.
Staffers collect recyclables in their cubicles,
then dump them into containers located on every floor,
carefully labeled for mixed paper or plastic and cans.
Even the garbage cans are labeled, as garbage, to avoid
contamination by PUC employees and the public,
who come here to pay water bills.
Plastic buckets are set out in
kitchen areas to collect used small batteries. “I call Steve Lee at DPH
when the buckets are full,” Rehbock said. “In
just a few months, we’ve collected 150 pounds of
batteries.” He also sends 10 spent toner cartridges
a week back to manufacturers.
To complete DOE’s annual
questionnaire, Rehbock has to return at night to check
the trash containers for material that should have
been recycled.
“I
survey them on three different nights, and I do see the
waste stream diminishing,” he said. “We used
to have three huge rolling dumpsters, four cubic yards
each, that were picked up three times a week. Now we’re
down to two, and the second isn’t even full.” Garbage
pickup at 1155 Market costs $20,000 a year.
Rehbock just completed the 2004
survey. He estimated that this PUC site recycled 4.5
tons of bottles and cans, 70 tons of paper and 7.8
tons of cardboard. The garbage dumpsters, he estimated,
were contaminated with 20% cardboard and paper from
his fellow workers and 10% bottles and cans from the
privately owned café on the ground
floor.
He’d be delighted to have composting in the building,
he said, and bemoans the missed opportunity to collect
food scraps from the cafe, but — more within his
control — from office parties, which happen at
least once a week.
$150,000 saved in 2003
Department of Environment’s
2003 annual report had some good news: The city saved
$150,000 in garbage pickup costs that year. Also, City
Hall, the government site with the most departments
in one building, managed to get its diversion rate
up to 66% by recycling paper, bottles, cans and cardboard.
Another plus was that 70% of the
city’s 49 departments
sent in their annual surveys in 2003, 16 more than the
previous year. Moreover, the number of department sites
reporting rose from 55 in 2002 to 120 in 2003. Many departments
have multiple sites — Rec and Park has 220 — and
each is expected to collect detailed recycling data.
The survey asks each department’s size; locations
where waste is generated (conference room, lobby, cafeteria);
the type of waste (mixed paper, food, wood, glass) and
what’s being recycled, reused, donated, composted;
waste-prevention measures such as setting computer and
printer defaults to double-sided (duplex) printing. Departments
have to calculate the recycled volume only if they are
in buildings by themselves, in which case they can get
the information from their garbage and recycling haulers.
The annual report had bad news, too. Among the no-shows
for the 2003 survey were some huge departments like Muni
and the Port, as well as the Academy of Sciences, Adult
Probation, Assessor/Recorder, Board of Appeals, Building
Inspection, Child Support Services, City Planning, Emergency
Communications, Municipal Transportation Agency, Public
Defender, Public Finance and Business Affairs, and War
Memorial and Performing Arts Center.
Chang works with 125 department recycling coordinators
and additional contact people in large departments, trains
them, fields their questions and consolidates the information
they send to her so the city can monitor its progress.
There’s no punishment for
not complying, and some departments have been thumbing
their noses at the reporting mandate for more than
four years.
“It’s an ongoing task to get everyone to
comply,” Chang concedes. “They say they don’t
have enough time or they don’t have the resources
to do it. It’s clearly not a priority for some.”
With the most recalcitrant departments,
Chang says she uses a time-honored method: “Leverage — I
try to get the Environment director (Jared Blumenfeld)
involved in talking to the department.”
The August 2004 supes resolution
has one more way for DOE to slap the hands of departments:
the city’s
whistle-blower complaint program. “Improper professional
conduct,” states the resolution, “includes
the purchase of unneeded supplies or equipment, and the
failure to reuse or recycle major resources or reduce
waste generation.”
Chang said that she’s received two whistle-blower
calls in the last year, one for a police station that
was not doing any recycling, the other fingering a privately
owned building leasing offices to city departments that
didn’t provide adequate recycling bins.
Environment’s next annual report is due to the
Board of Supervisors June 1.
What’s getting recycled
Though the Assessor/Recorder’s Office hasn’t
filed a report, that doesn’t mean its workers are
tossing mixed paper willy-nilly in the garbage. There’s
just no report documenting the department’s efforts.
“Most departments are recycling at least paper,” Chang
said, “but they don’t necessarily have a
committed staff person to fill out the report, [and]
most could do a better job of reusing and recycling,
but it takes upper-management support and innovative
practices to make that happen.”
So Environment’s annual report
works with the info it has from departments and from
Norcal Waste Systems. Norcal is a private company with
32 subsidiaries in California, including Golden Gate
Disposal, Sunset Scavenger, Recycle Central at Pier
96, and Vacaville composter Jepson Prairie Organics.
Of the 96,277 tons of city government
waste that didn’t
go to landfill in 2003, the lion’s share (75%)
was 72,143 tons of debris from building construction
and demolition and street and water line repairs, most
collected by the Department of Public Works and then
recycled or reused. DPW, for example, used 3,140 tons
of concrete debris and reused 23,000 tons of sand to
reinforce eroding bluffs at Ocean Beach.
City departments snatched another
16% (15,053 tons) away from the garbage collectors
in the form of compostables — brush,
grass, trees and food scraps.
“We get at least two truckloads of trimmings a
day just from Rec and Park,” said Robert Reed,
Norcal director of corporate communications. Jepson turns
all of San Francisco’s compostables into a rich
organic fertilizer called Four Course that, Reed says,
is in great demand by vineyards.
Residential customers in San Francisco get free compost
pickup. City government, however, like all commercial
operations, pays to get rid of compostables, though the
cost is 25% less than for trash. The city gets no return
on the compost Jepson makes.
Scrap metal — old metal desks, Muni rails, copper
pipes and more — constitutes another 2%, or 2,198
tons, of what departments recycle. And office recyclables
comprise the final 7% (6,883 tons; of that, 10% are bottles,
cans and wood pallets, 90% is mixed paper and cardboard.
According to Mike Ward, assistant
director of the Department of Administrative Services,
the city has a $4.5 million Office Depot contract,
excluding paper, furniture and computers. And John
Danaher, who handles the city’s
paper contracts with six vendors, said copier paper alone
cost close to $900,000 last year.
“We buy between 20,000 and 35,000 cases of copier
paper a year,” Danaher said, “and then there’s
the janitorial paper — we’re averaging $1.3
million a year for that.” DOE requires all copier
and bond paper to have at least 30% post-consumer recycled
content.
A personal commitment
The Department on the Status of Women has seven staff
members in a suite of three offices at 25 Van Ness. Acting
Policy Analyst Bernice Casey is in her second year as
recycling coordinator.
“Recycling’s important to me personally,” Casey
said. “After two years, I’m noticing that
everyone’s paying more attention to it and doing
it willingly.” She only remembers having to “shame” a
fellow staffer once.
“We
haven’t ordered paper clips or binder clips for
two years — we reuse all of them,” she said. “Because
we have older copiers without duplexing capacity, we
reuse the second side of all paper. We always ask ourselves, ‘Do
you really need to print that out?’ And we avoid
printing multiple copies whenever possible.”
Department commissioners get packets of information
in used binders or report covers, and with used tabs.
Staff eat lunch off dishes and utensils brought from
home to eliminate paper plates and plasticware.
“We
have a container for aluminum and glass under the sink,” Casey
said. “When the janitors don’t pick it up,
Rosario Navarrette, our deputy director, takes it home
with her.”
DOE doesn’t want to pit department against department,
Chang said, but the annual report did give kudos to DPW
as the city’s top recycler, by volume. Of course,
DPW also weighs in as the primo waste generator: All
that concrete.
The top 10 waste generators after DPW are SFO, S.F.
General Hospital, Rec and Park, Laguna Honda, Hall of
Justice, Muni, Sheriff, Fire and Police. The list was
created by calculating how much trash was hauled away
from an entire department, such as Rec and Park in all
its locations, or from a single city-owned building,
such as the Hall of Justice.
Perhaps the biggest part of Chang’s job is to
turn wasters into environmental good guys. “I’m
working with the Sheriff’s Department to implement
food composting at the Hall of Justice,” she said, “so
once that program begins, the Sheriff’s Department
will also be a top recycler/composter.”
Chang also is working with the
S.F. General and Laguna Honda’s cafeterias to
get composting going. Once in place, she estimates
each can easily be composting 200 tons a year.
Checklist of recycling problems
All departments seem to have interesting stories about
recycling.
At Fox Plaza, 29 staff members of the Department of
Children, Youth and Their Families work in a single suite
that takes up half a floor.
“I got the recycling coordinator job four years
ago by default,” said Office Manager Anna Rainey. “But
I’ve learned so much that now I do it because it
interests me — I’m a converted recycler and
a true stickler.”
Environment has stepped up city
department monitoring, she said, and she’s all
for it. In January, DOE gave recycling coordinators
an official contamination notice to hand out to noncompliant
or careless fellow employees.
The notice has a check list of “problems”: “recyclable
items were found in your trash such as paper bottles,
cans, plastic containers”; “reusable items
were found in your trash such as folders, envelopes”; “trash
items were found in your recycling such as plastic bags,
food packaging such as Styrofoam or paper cups.”
Rainey likes the idea of the “report card.” So
far, she’s only used it once, for a minor infraction,
she said. “I get a little resistance from staff — when
I sent out a notice about new bins, I found the notices
in the recycling bin.” That was a joke.
She’s always looking for creative ways to recycle.
Staffers use note pads made from their fax machines’ one-sided
confirmation/busy signal notices.
“We collect them in a special box,” Rainey
said, “and every few months I take them to the
city’s Reproduction Services at 875 Stevenson.
They make them into about 20 pads for us.”
Also in Fox Plaza is a unit of
the city attorney’s
office with 200-plus employees. Office Administrator
and Recycling Coordinator Mary Jane Winslow says everyone
in her office seems willing to participate in recycling.
“We’re educated San Franciscans,” she
said. But there’s one standard recycling practice
this office can’t comply with. “Because of
legal issues and confidentiality, we don’t reuse
the back sides of paper.”
Rick Koehler, assistant personnel
manager in the Sheriff’s
Department, oversees recycling at 13 sites. To complete
the annual survey takes a couple of days, he says, because
he has to collect information from the seven officers
at Laguna Honda, the five at the Youth Guidance Center,
the 60 workers at the main office in City Hall and the
other 10 sites.
Like other coordinators, he keeps
his eye out for unusual opportunities: “We recently changed the officers’ uniforms
and had a lot of generic pants. We donated 700 or 800
pairs to a local charity.”
Even better than city hall
How does the Department of the
Environment’s diversion
rate measure up? It’s the best.

“We divert 90% of our waste,” Chang said. “We
have four floors of cubicles. No one has a personal wastebasket.
Every floor has one container for garbage, one for recycling
and one for compost.”
Staffers go through a special training
when they come on board. For events, caterers are asked
to bring nothing that’s “disposable”: All containers
and utensils should be able to be recycled, composted
or reused. On display in the office is a plastic-looking
container — the kind that a deli would put a pasta
salad in, for example — that’s made out of
cornstarch and is both microwavable and reusable. When
its day is finally done, it can be composted.
Environment uses 100% post-consumer recycled paper,
and in the bathrooms, the paper towels and toilet-seat
liners are a special compostable paper.
The 70 people working at DOE generate only two 74-gallon
toters of garbage a week. Also, in a week they fill a
32-gallon compost toter and four 64-gallon recycling
toters, one with bottles and cans and four with paper.
What about that 10% the department
can’t seem
to divert? It’s pesky things like plastic bags,
plastic bottle caps and Styrofoam, Chang said. “There’s
always a little something.”
Meantime, Environment continues
to work to turn dross into gold — at least the
recycled, reused, composted equivalent of it.
This story was supported in part by the Neighborhood
Environmental Newswire.
sidebar: Fire
Dept. saves $80,000
In 2003, the Department of Environment
decided to test its assumption that full-scale
composting and recycling could not only help
the environment but could save the city a bundle.
It needed a department that didn’t share
building space with other departments and whose
staff consumed a lot of food.
Clang! San Francisco’s
46 free-standing fire stations are filled with
gourmands. And SFFD’s garbage bill in 2002
was $200,000 — perhaps a peanut-y percentage
of its $200 million budget, but still a nice
hunk of dough.
“Environment staffers went
to each station the night before its regular
garbage pickup to see what was being thrown away,” explained
Gloria Chan, DOE’s public information officer.
Using flashlights and gloves,
they pawed through the garbage, and discovered
that firefighters were already diverting about
30% of their throwaways by recycling.
“We also found that 75%
of what was in the garbage could have been recycled
or composted,” Chan said.
DOE staff and reps of Norcal
and the Oakland-based Applied Composting Consulting
trained the firefighters, and, within four months,
the stations had bumped up their composting and
recycling diversion to 80%.
SFFD, the first U.S. fire department
to participate in such a program, saved $80,000
that year, Chan said.
“The program is still going
strong after two years,” said Assistant
Deputy Chief Lorrie Kalos, whose SFFD division
is in charge of firehouse maintenance. “There
was resistance from some firefighters at first — it
was a learning process, something new, maybe
a little bit of a nuisance. But we made it mandatory,
and I think everyone’s come to realize
it’s just the right thing to do.”
– Marjorie
Beggs |
sidebar: Nonprofits
recycle 94% of city’s e-waste
Good to recycle paper. Great
to compost organic scraps. Wonderful to reuse
construction materials. Now what about the ubiquitous
electronic gear? The computers, monitors, keyboards
on every desk, the fax machines and printers
in every office? The cell phones, pagers, scanners,
cables, drives?
“A computer in working
condition that’s too slow for a high-power
user, such as an engineer, may be perfectly usable
for an employee doing only word processing and
small spreadsheet work,” said Julia Chang,
the Department of Environment’s city government
recycling coordinator. The same computer might
also find a happy home at a nonprofit.
Chang says that 6% of city-purchased
electronic equipment is reused by other S.F.
government workers; the rest goes to Alameda
County Computer Resource Center in Berkeley,
Community Computer Center in San Francisco and
Computer Recycling Center in Santa Rosa.
These nonprofits refurbish equipment,
donate it to other nonprofits and recycle the
unusable. The goal is to keep hazardous e-waste — the
equipment contains mercury, arsenic, cadmium,
barium, silver, selenium, chromium, lead — out
of landfills.
“The nonprofits screen
computers and parts for reuse,” Chang said. “They
strip, separate and deliver components to other
recylers downstream, who recycle the metal and
circuit boards from cpu’s, the glass and
lead from monitors, the plastics from monitors,
keyboards and mice.”
Because government economics
are tight, departments are holding on to computers
longer these days so the reuse numbers have dropped.
Disposing of e-waste is a big
problem that won’t get smaller. “The
nation’s electronic waste is increasing
by 3% to 5% a year, almost three times as fast
as total municipal waste,” according to
a Neighborhood Environment Newswire article published
in March. The source of that stat was the research
and advocacy group Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition
– Marjorie Beggs |
Photo credit: Photo
illustration by Carl Angel
Photo credit: Lenny
Limjoco
{Home} Central
City Extra |
|