No. 45, April 2005 Homeless dine and pay with food stamps S.F.’s pioneering program
for restaurants tops in nation
by Marjorie Beggs San Francisco — the city and county that knows
how — still holds its title as the first and
only California county whose homeless food stamp recipients
can pay their restaurant tabs with food stamps. They can get a green burrito
at Carl’s Jr. at
U.N. Plaza, a plate of pot stickers from Oriental Restaurant
on Market Street, a piece of pizza from Chico’s
on Sixth Street, or hot chow from 14 other restaurants,
most in or near the city center. And they do it with
a swipe of their EBT card. 
St. Mary's College volunteer at St. Anthony's helps
food stamp applicant during DHS' outreach effort,
Food Stamps in Day.
EBTs, electronic benefits transfer
cards, replaced paper food stamps in 2003 and operate
exactly like the more ubiquitous and upscale ATM
debit cards. The cost of the food is automatically
subtracted from the card-holder’s monthly food
stamp allotment, which in San Francisco averages
$98. The U.S. Department of Agriculture, which runs the
food stamp program, has allowed seniors and the disabled
nationwide to use their food stamps when dining out
since the early 1980s, and 15 years ago gave states
the option of expanding the Restaurant Meals Program
to the homeless. But the expansion has been a
hard sell: Eateries in most locations simply don’t
want to encourage the patronage of homeless people. Today,
only 19 states are participating in the restaurant
program and of those, only five are implementing the
homeless option — Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota,
Oregon, and California, the last to sign on, in May
2004. The four states besides California
have just a handful of restaurants participating
among them. According to Dennis Stewart, Western
regional director of USDA’s
Food and Nutrition Service, only 27 restaurants nationwide
accept food stamps from the homeless. Two-thirds of
those are here in the city, Stewart said, the legacy
of a mayor who’s made a priority of homeless
services. San Francisco the Star San Francisco got a special waiver to try out the
homeless restaurant option in March 2003, more than
a year before the state gave its blessing to statewide
implementation of the program. S.F.’s pilot project flew.
High. “It’s definitely a success here,” said
Leo O’Farrell, director of Human Services’ nonassistance
food stamp program (stamps for those ineligible for
public assistance but who meet income guidelines). “This
February, food stamp recipients bought 8,000 meals,
and in its first year, restaurant program sales were
more than half a million.” That’s half
of the program’s $1 million sales nationwide. O’Farrell estimates that of the city’s
28,487 people who received food stamps last year, about
4,000 homeless and 2,000 seniors or disabled were eligible
for the restaurant bonus. But right now there’s
no way to know how many are using their EBTs at restaurants. “When they get their EBTs, we also issue them
a yellow ID card for the program, if they’re
eligible,” said Ylonda Calloway, support analyst
for the city’s food stamp program and the only
outreach staffer for the restaurant program. “But
we have no idea if they use them. Probably by next
month, that information will be automated, embedded
in the EBT, so we can stop issuing IDs by hand and
we’ll know how many people are out there buying
meals.” Carl’s Jr. on Board Mohammed Safdar has been the
manager at Carl’s
Jr. at 10 United Nations Plaza for six years. “We’ve been in the restaurant program
for just over a year,” he said, “and I’d
say about 10% of our customers use their EBTs here.
In January, we took in $13,700, just from this program.” Safdar said joining the program
was his idea. “I
was at a grocery store on Seventh Street and the owner
told me about Subway Sandwich being part of the program
and suggested that I find out about it. So I told my
district manager and he told me to go ahead.” Since
then, two other Carl’s Jr.s have joined. It took about a month to implement
the program at the U.N. Plaza franchise site and
was smooth from start to finish, thanks, Safdar said,
to Calloway’s
help at every step. The only confusion came shortly
after the EBT reader was installed. “At first I thought anyone with an EBT card
could use it here,” Safdar said. “We were
getting up to $1,300 to $1,400 a day. Then we got a
letter saying we were violating the law — we
could only serve seniors, disabled or homeless with
EBTs and they had to have an ID card saying they were
part of the program. The sales dropped way down when
we began doing it right.” Most of the Carl’s Jr. customers in the program
are homeless people, rather than seniors or disabled,
Safdar said. “You have to have a lot of patience
dealing with customers like ours, but I’m used
to it. And this is a really good program. If another
restaurant asked about joining, I’d say to do
it. I also tell my customers to tell their family and
friends about the program, if they’re eligible.” Restaurants begin by signing an MOU with S.F. Department
of Human Services in which they agree to serve low-cost
or discounted meals to food stamp participants, post
a sign saying they are part of the program, agree to
all USDA rules and regulations about food stamps, including
not accepting EBTs for alcoholic beverages and not
charging sales tax. “After the MOU, there’s state and federal
paperwork, and I help any restaurant that wants to
join the program do it all,” Calloway said. “I
know the ins and outs, and how to get applications
into the right hands. It usually takes no more than
a month.” Restaurants have to pass a Department
of Public Health inspection and submit bank information.
Once the USDA authorizes them to accept food stamps,
they get free gear from the state — a point
of sale device for swiping EBT cards, PIN pad, receipt
printer and printer supplies. Calloway trains staff
on how to use the equipment. EBT purchases are deposited in
the restaurant’s
bank electronically every working day. The EBT machine
gives the owner or manager an accounting of the previous
day’s transactions. “I also have confidential access to dollar amounts
and transactions for individual restaurants,” Calloway
said. “That’s how I monitor the program.” The Sixth St. Experience Lien Thai, owner and manager
of Honey Donut & Deli
on Sixth Street, signed on for the program two years
ago, just a few months after she bought the restaurant.
Besides doughnuts, she sells bacon and eggs, oatmeal,
hamburgers and other hot fare. Thai says she’s had no problems with the EBTs,
except that sometimes people don’t have their
yellow ID cards and get angry if she says she can’t
serve them. Though she gets a daily report of how much
she’s taken in via the EBTs, she wasn’t
sure how much that amounted to monthly. “Right after people get their food stamps, maybe
10 to 15 people a day use the EBTs, but when they run
out it’s maybe four a day,” Thai said. “Our
business is very slow now — I don’t know
why. If I wasn’t in the program, there’d
be even less business.” Thai said she’d recommend
the program to other restaurants. Just up the street, at Victory Restaurant, steam tables
of fried chicken, rice, fish and other hot foods were
ready for the lunch crowd. Wendy Ho was sounding discouraged
about the EBTs. She and her husband have owned the
Victory for four years and they were among the first
to join the restaurant program. They make money from it — she estimates $200
to $300 a day early in the month and $100 daily the
final week — but she cites problems. “A lot want to cheat. They come without their
yellow IDs and lie about it,” she said, “or
they swipe the card when they know there’s nothing
left in it (as with ATMs, the sale is immediately rejected).
Then they get very angry and yell at me. Or they want
to pay after they get their food, but they don’t
have their card and when I say no, they get mad.” It’s bad to have other customers see that, but
there’s worse. “I get a lot of people with
cards who go and ask someone sitting in the restaurant
for, say, $3. They say they’ll get them another
meal. Then they swipe their card, get the food and
take the cash.” She lowered her voice. “They’re
doing it to get money for drugs. And they do it right
in front of me.” Ho and her husband are trying to sell their restaurant.
She talked fondly of the 13 years she spent as a home
health care worker for On Lok. It was a much easier
life, she said. Ebb and Flow of Eateries Calloway hopes to keep adding
more restaurants to the 17 on the program roster;
as of the end of March, three more were in the hopper. “We’re proud
of this program, and we definitely need to do more
outreach, but staffing shortages keep us from doing
the necessary footwork,” she said. In March, she made a presentation at the Tenderloin
Futures Collaborative and plans to do more of the same
in other neighborhoods, keeping the focus on recruiting
restaurants that are already serving the homeless. Six months ago, there were
22 restaurants in the S.F. program, 14 of them Subway
Sandwich shops. The number of Subways has now dropped
to nine. “The Subway numbers constantly change,” Calloway
said. “They’re often sold or transferred
from owner to owner. Just like with any retailer who
accepts food stamps, if the ownership changes, the
authorization process has to start all over. But besides
Subway, no one’s dropped out of the program.” Elsewhere in the state, Los Angeles
County is getting ready to add its homeless to the
restaurant program, according to USDA’s Stewart. He’s pleased
L.A.’s coming on board, but he’s also concerned
that the restaurant program, like the food stamp program
in general, is underutilized. “As few as half the people who are eligible
for food stamps in California are taking advantage
of the program,” Stewart said. In San Francisco, that figure may be higher or lower,
66% or 44%, depending on whose statistics you use. District 10 Supervisor Sophie
Maxwell held a hearing in February to explore how
aggressively — or
not — the city is going after federal funding
to improve childhood nutrition. Since then, she’s
asked the city attorney to draft a policy of nutrition
standards and to check into the possibility of mandating city
agencies and CBOs to step up their efforts to bring
in the bucks. In question, at the top of the
list, was DHS’ food
stamp program, which costs $23.5 million to administer
and whose staff oversee the distribution of $33.5 million
worth of food stamps to 11,546 children and 16,941
adults. Harvey Rose, the supes’ budget
analyst, prepared a fat report for the February hearing.
It included nutrition staff estimates of the percentage
of people eligible for that benefit who actually
get it. Food stamps said 56%. The other programs
ranged from 17% of eligible students getting school
breakfasts to 122% getting WIC benefits. The budget analyst also included
data from a 2004 report by California Food Policy
Advocates, a nonprofit headquartered in San Francisco.
It said 86,585 San Franciscans are eligible for food
stamps but two-thirds don’t get them, a loss
of $60 million in federal funds. O’Farrell questions the nonprofit’s number
of eligible food stamp recipients. “I think the advocates simply looked at annual
income from the 2000 census,” O’Farrell
told The Extra when we asked about the budget analyst’s
report. “They just didn’t factor in personal
assets, resources, immigration status and SSI/SSP that
can disqualify people. Here in the city we know there
are people who are eligible who aren’t getting
food stamps. I support the 44% figure.” Food Stamps in a Day On a rainy morning in late March,
The Extra caught up with O’Farrell at the Hamilton
Family Center in the Haight, a 24-hour shelter for
homeless families that also provides meals and support
services to homeless people. O’Farrell arrived at Hamilton with six eligibility
workers and a few supervisors and IT people, who lugged
in cardboard boxes of applications and informational
materials and computers. At long tables, they talked
with about 50 people, mostly homeless from nearby Golden
Gate Park and Haight Street. Homeless families weren’t
part of this outreach, O’Farrell said, because
they are “mostly already wired for benefits” through
other programs. By midafternoon, he estimated that 40 people got the
good news: Based on an interview, they appeared to
be eligible for food stamps, their name had gone into
the computer and their EBT card would be ready for
them the next day. This was DHS’ third Food Stamps in a Day outreach
effort, a program O’Farrell started in January. “Our first two days were at St. Anthony’s,” O’Farrell
said, “and each time we talked to about 50 people
and got 40 approved. We plan to go back again.” While O’Farrell and his crew set up upstairs
from the dining room, St. Anthony’s volunteers
and staff had talked to people lined up outside waiting
for lunch, explained Lisa O’Neill, St. Anthony’s
media associate. The St. Anthony’s folks used a one-page “screener,” a
list of questions to eliminate those with no chance
of getting food stamps: noncitizens and illegal residents;
SSI and SSP recipients; people with felony convictions
for selling or trafficking drugs (as of Jan. 1 this
year, convictions for drug use and possession no longer
disqualified food stamp applicants); and monthly income
over $1,009 for a one-person household. Those who appeared to be eligible
went upstairs for a formal interview. They didn’t even need paperwork
to verify their identity or income; they could just
state their Social Security number. O’Farrell
told The Extra that in cases like that, his staff went
so far as to call relatives or friends of the person
applying to check the veracity of the information. Food Stamp Stats Overstated O’Neill said St. Anthony’s
was delighted to collaborate with DHS and to have
more of its clients get food stamps and be able to
eat at restaurants. “We’re serving an average of 2,400 meals
day, up 20% from two years ago,” O’Neill
said. “We want our guests to be able to expand
their resources for meals.” A Feb. 15 press release from
St. Anthony’s announcing
the second Food Stamps in a Day included some numbers
to explain the need for more outreach: “For every
dollar in food stamp benefits entering the city, there
is an economic impact of about $1.84.” O’Farrell
said that figure came from USDA’s economic research
services and that Stewart had cited it at the city’s
February nutrition hearing. He had no quibbles with
it. Not so the other statistics in
the release — that
66% of eligible people citywide weren’t getting
food stamps, that the city was losing $60 million a
year, and that 82% of people in the Tenderloin weren’t
getting the food stamps they were entitled to. “I don’t know where these numbers regarding
Tenderloin food stamp participation come from,” O’Farrell
said in an e-mail. As for the rest, he was emphatic: “Lies,
damn lies and statistics!” {Home} Central
City Extra |